首页> 外文OA文献 >Developing a theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development activities on clinical practice: a study protocol
【2h】

Developing a theory-based instrument to assess the impact of continuing professional development activities on clinical practice: a study protocol

机译:开发基于理论的工具来评估持续专业发展活动对临床实践的影响:研究方案

代理获取
本网站仅为用户提供外文OA文献查询和代理获取服务,本网站没有原文。下单后我们将采用程序或人工为您竭诚获取高质量的原文,但由于OA文献来源多样且变更频繁,仍可能出现获取不到、文献不完整或与标题不符等情况,如果获取不到我们将提供退款服务。请知悉。

摘要

Abstract Background Continuing professional development (CPD) is one of the principal means by which health professionals (i.e. primary care physicians and specialists) maintain, improve, and broaden the knowledge and skills required for optimal patient care and safety. However, the lack of a widely accepted instrument to assess the impact of CPD activities on clinical practice thwarts researchers' comparisons of the effectiveness of CPD activities. Using an integrated model for the study of healthcare professionals' behaviour, our objective is to develop a theory-based, valid, reliable global instrument to assess the impact of accredited CPD activities on clinical practice. Methods Phase 1: We will analyze the instruments identified in a systematic review of factors influencing health professionals' behaviours using criteria that reflect the literature on measurement development and CPD decision makers' priorities. The outcome of this phase will be an inventory of instruments based on social cognitive theories. Phase 2: Working from this inventory, the most relevant instruments and their related items for assessing the concepts listed in the integrated model will be selected. Through an e-Delphi process, we will verify whether these instruments are acceptable, what aspects need revision, and whether important items are missing and should be added. The outcome of this phase will be a new global instrument integrating the most relevant tools to fit our integrated model of healthcare professionals' behaviour. Phase 3: Two data collections are planned: (1) a test-retest of the new instrument, including item analysis, to assess its reliability and (2) a study using the instrument before and after CPD activities with a randomly selected control group to explore the instrument's mere-measurement effect. Phase 4: We will conduct individual interviews and focus groups with key stakeholders to identify anticipated barriers and enablers for implementing the new instrument in CPD practice. Phase 5: Drawing on the results from the previous phases, we will use consensus-building methods to develop with the decision makers a plan to implement the new instrument. Discussion This project proposes to give stakeholders a theory-based global instrument to validly and reliably measure the impacts of CPD activities on clinical practice, thus laying the groundwork for more targeted and effective knowledge-translation interventions in the future.
机译:摘要背景持续专业发展(CPD)是卫生专业人员(即初级保健医生和专家)维护,改善和扩展最佳患者护理和安全所必需的知识和技能的主要手段之一。但是,缺乏一种广泛接受的评估CPD活动对临床实践影响的工具,妨碍了研究人员对CPD活动有效性的比较。我们使用集成模型来研究医疗保健专业人员的行为,目的是开发一种基于理论的,有效,可靠的全球性工具,以评估获得认可的CPD活动对临床实践的影响。方法阶段1:我们将使用反映测量发展和CPD决策者优先事项文献的标准来分析系统评估健康专业人员行为的因素中识别出的手段。此阶段的结果将是基于社会认知理论的工具清单。阶段2:从清单中选择最相关的工具及其相关项目,以评估集成模型中列出的概念。通过e-Delphi流程,我们将验证这些工具是否可以接受,哪些方面需要修改,以及是否缺少重要的项目并应添加。此阶段的结果将是一种新的全球工具,该工具将整合最相关的工具以适合我们的医疗保健专业人员行为的综合模型。阶段3:计划进行两次数据收集:(1)对新仪器进行重新测试,包括项目分析,以评估其可靠性;(2)在CPD活动之前和之后使用该仪器与随机选择的对照组进行研究,以评估其可靠性。探索仪器的单纯测量效果。阶段4:我们将与主要利益相关者进行个别访谈和焦点小组讨论,以发现在CPD实践中实施新工具的预期障碍和推动因素。阶段5:借鉴先前阶段的结果,我们将使用建立共识的方法与决策者一起制定实施新工具的计划。讨论该项目建议为利益相关者提供一种基于理论的全球工具,以有效和可靠地衡量CPD活动对临床实践的影响,从而为将来更有针对性和有效的知识翻译干预措施奠定基础。

相似文献

  • 外文文献
  • 中文文献
  • 专利
代理获取

客服邮箱:kefu@zhangqiaokeyan.com

京公网安备:11010802029741号 ICP备案号:京ICP备15016152号-6 六维联合信息科技 (北京) 有限公司©版权所有
  • 客服微信

  • 服务号